Evidence-Based Reviews

Assessing decisional capacity in patients with substance use disorders

Current Psychiatry. 2019 October;18(10):35-40

References

1. Karlawish K. Assessment of decision-making capacity in adults. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/assessment-of-decision-making-capacity-in-adults. Updated July 2019. Accessed August 19, 2019.
2. Owens PL, Mutter R, Stocks C. Mental health and substance abuse-related emergency department visits among adults, 2007. HCUP Statistical Brief #92. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52659/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK52659.pdf. Published July 2010. Accessed August 19, 2019.
3. Smothers BA, Yahr HT. Alcohol use disorder and illicit drug use in admissions to general hospitals in the United States. Am J Addict. 2005;14(3):256-267.
4. Jeste DV, Saks E. Decisional capacity in mental illness and substance use disorders: empirical database and policy implications. Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(4):607-628.
5. Bechara A, Damasio H. Decision-making and addiction (part I): impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1675-1689.
6. Grant S, Contoreggi C, London ED. Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(8):1180-1187.
7. MacDonald TK, Zanna MP, Fong GT. Decision making in altered states: effects of alcohol on attitudes toward drinking and driving. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68(6):973-985.
8. Boettger S, Bergman M, Jenewein J, et al. Assessment of decisional capacity: prevalence of medical illness and psychiatric comorbidities. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(5):1275-1281.
9. Charland LC. Chapter 6: Decision-making capacity and responsibility in addiction. In: Poland J, Graham G. Addiction and responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Scholarship Online; 2011:139-158.
10. Martel ML, Klein LR, Miner JR, et al. A brief assessment of capacity to consent instrument in acutely intoxicated emergency department patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(1):18-23.
11. MacLullich AM, Beaglehole A, Hall RJ, et al. Delirium and long-term cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2009;21(1):30-42.
12. Pandharipande PP, Girard TD, Jackson JC, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1306-1316.
13. Rehm J, Hasan OSM, Black SE, et al. Alcohol use and dementia: a systematic scoping review. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11(1):1.
14. Jain A, Christopher P, Appelbaum PS. Civil commitment for opioid and other substance use disorders: does it work? Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69(4):374-376.
15. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Chapter 6: Using the MacArthur competence assessment tool – treatment. In: Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. Assessing competence to consent to treatment: a guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998:101-126.
16. Hazelton LD, Sterns GL, Chisholm T. Decision-making capacity and alcohol abuse: clinical and ethical considerations in personal care choices. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003;25(2):130-135.

While most clinicians rely on a psychiatric interview (with or without a cognitive examination) to make these determinations, several instruments have been developed to aid these evaluations, such as the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (Mac-CAT-T).¹⁵ In patients with potentially reversible incapacitating conditions, serial examinations over time, especially re-evaluation when a patient has achieved and maintained sobriety, may be necessary and helpful.

The Table offers a guide to assessing decisional capacity in a patient with an SUD.

Who should conduct the assessment?

Mental health professionals—usually psychiatrists or psychologists—are consulted when there is uncertainty about a patient’s decisional capacity, and when a more thorough mental status examination is warranted to formulate an informed opinion.¹⁶ Unfortunately, this typically occurs only if a patient refuses treatment or demands to be discharged before treatment has been completed, or there is a high level of risk to the patient or others after discharge.

In acute settings, when a patient consents to treatment, a psychiatric consultation regarding decisional capacity is rarely requested. While it is often tempting for medical or surgical teams to proceed with an intervention in a cooperative patient who willingly signs a consent form without a formal assessment of his/her decisional capacity, doing so raises challenging ethical and legal questions in the event of an adverse outcome. It is therefore prudent to strongly recommend that medical and surgical colleagues obtain a psychiatric consultation when an individual’s decisional capacity is uncertain, especially when a patient is known to have a psychiatric or neurocognitive disorder, or exhibits evidence of recent mental status changes. In cases of potentially reversible impairment (eg, delirium, psychosis, or acute anxiety), targeted interventions may help restore capacity and allow treatment to proceed.

No jurisdictions mandate that the determination of decisional capacity should be made exclusively by a mental health professional. Any treating health care professional (usually the attending physician) can make a determination of decisional capacity in scenarios where there is no overt evidence the patient has a mental or cognitive disorder and the patient is communicating clear and reasoned choices, or when a patient is profoundly impaired and no meaningful communication can take place.

Continue to: CASE CONTINUED

References

Autism, pain, and the NMDA receptor

Assessing decisional capacity in patients with substance use disorders

References

Who should conduct the assessment?

Pages

Next Article: