Clinical Review

2016 Update on contraception

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

What this evidence means for practiceThis study provides further reassurance regarding the low risk of pelvic infection among women with an LNG IUS. Insertion of an IUS should not be delayed to await results of Chlamydia or gonorrhea testing in a woman without clinical evidence of pelvic infection. Risk-based, as opposed to universal testing, is imperative.12 These recommendations are in agreement with current recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.13,14 Practices that employ 2-visit protocols unnecessarily limit women’s access to the IUS, as research has shown that nearly half of women desiring an IUD do not return for device placement if a second encounter is required.15

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Pages

Next Article:

As Zika looms, are LARCs the answer?

Related Articles