Coding

Maintaining Adequate Third-Party Compensation
While it is important to pay close attention to newer third-party vehicles, do not ignore established payers or assume their compensation...
Murad Alam, MD, MSCI
From Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
The author reports no conflict of interest.
This article provides general information. Physicians should consult Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) guidelines, state regulations, and payer rules for coding and billing guidance relevant to specific cases. The opinions represented here are those of the author and have not been reviewed, endorsed, or approved by the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Dermatology, or any other coding or billing authority.
Correspondence: Murad Alam, MD, MSCI, 676 N Saint Clair St, Ste 1600, Chicago, IL 60611 (m-alam@northwestern.edu).
Final Thoughts
It is clear that frequent use of modifier -25 is appropriate in routine, high-quality dermatologic practice. Simultaneous provision of E/M services and minor procedures often is in the patient’s best interest, as it minimizes unnecessary office visits and expedites treatment. When modifier -25 is appropriately appended, careful documentation by the dermatologist can help to clarify the precise basis for its use. Recent NCCI edits provide guidelines for use of this modifier that can be adapted by individual dermatologists for particular patient circumstances.2
While it is important to pay close attention to newer third-party vehicles, do not ignore established payers or assume their compensation...
Dr. Patrick Feehan discusses the electronic health record (EHR) mandate and its impact on small to medium-sized dermatology practices.