Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementBase::execute($args = [], $options = []) should either be compatible with PDOStatement::execute(?array $params = null): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2246 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2348 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2348 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2348 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2348 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2348 of /var/www/webmd/apps/mdedge/htdocs/includes/database/database.inc).
Original Research
Evaluation of Glycemic Control and Cost Savings Associated With Liraglutide Dose Reduction at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
Fiona Imarhia is a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Home Based Primary Care and Janeca Malveaux is a Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Primary Care, both at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas. Correspondence: Fiona Imarhia (fiona.imarhia@va.gov)
Author disclosures The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.
Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations— including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.
Purpose: As a result of a cost savings initiative, the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas, selected liraglutide as its preferred glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a preferred maximum daily dose of 1.2 mg. With this change, several veterans were converted from liraglutide 1.8 mg daily to 1.2 mg daily; however, the benefit of this change remains unknown. The objective of this study was to assess sustained glycemic control and cost savings that resulted from the liraglutide dose reduction.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to include veterans on liraglutide 1.8 mg daily and insulin and/ or other antihyperglycemic agents who were converted to liraglutide 1.2 mg daily between May 2018 and August 2018. Demographic data, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), serum glucose levels, body weight, prescriber type, and medication history were obtained using the Computerized Patient Record System. Veterans’ charts were evaluated over a 6-month evaluation period, and descriptive statistics and paired t tests were used to analyze results as appropriate.
Results: A total of 97 veterans were included. At the time of conversion, the average (SD) HbA1c was 8.2% (1.4), and body average (SD) weight was 116.2 kg (23.2). Six months after the dose conversion, average (SD) HbA1c increased to 8.7% (1.8) (95% CI, –0.76 to -0.22; P = .0005), and average (SD) body weight increased to 116.5 kg (24.6) (95% CI, –2.11 to 1.64; P = .8). To account for the HbA1c increase, 41.2% of veterans underwent an insulin dose increase, whereas 40.2% of veterans had no medication dose changes. An estimated annual cost savings of $230,922.72 resulted from the liraglutide dose reduction.
Conclusions: Dose reduction of daily liraglutide treatment from 1.8 mg to 1.2 mg was associated with HbA1c increase, increased insulin requirements, and cost savings. A cost effectiveness analysis is needed to assess overall benefit of the liraglutide dose reduction initiative.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are injectable incretin hormones approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). They are highly efficacious agents with hemoglobin A 1c (Hb A1c) reduction potential of approximately 0.8 to 1.6% and mechanisms of action that result in an average weight loss of 1 to 3 kg. 1,2 Published in 2016, The LEADER (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) trial established cardiovascular benefits associated with liraglutide, making it a preferred GLP-1 RA. 3
In addition to HbA 1c reduction, weight loss, and cardiovascular benefits, liraglutide also has shown insulin-sparing effects when used in combination with insulin. A trial by Lane and colleagues revealed a 34% decrease in total daily insulin dose 6 months after the addition of liraglutide to insulin in patients with T2DM receiving > 100 units of insulin daily. 4 When used in combination with basal insulin analogues (glargine or detemir) similar findings also were shown. 5
The Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) in Houston, Texas, selected liraglutide as its preferred GLP-1 RA because of its favorable glycemic and cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, as part of a cost-savings initiative for fiscal year 2018, liraglutide 6 mg/mL injection 2-count pen packs was selected as the preferred liraglutide product. Before the availability of the 2-count pen packs, veterans previously received 3-count pen packs, which allowed for up to a 30-day supply of liraglutide 1.8 mg daily dosing. However, the cost-efficient 2-count pen packs allow for up to 1.2 mg daily dose of liraglutide for a 30-day supply. Due to these changes, veterans at MEDVAMC were converted from liraglutide 1.8 mg daily to 1.2 mg daily between May 2018 and August 2018.
The primary objective of this study was to assess sustained glycemic control and cost savings that resulted from this change. The secondary objectives were to assess sustained weight loss and adverse effects (AEs).
Methods
This study was approved by the MEDVAMC Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs committee. In this single-center study, a retrospective chart review was conducted on veterans with T2DM who underwent a liraglutide dose reduction from 1.8 mg daily to 1.2 mg daily between May 2018 and August 2018. Patients were included if they were aged ≥ 18 years with an active prescription for liraglutide 1.8 mg daily and insulin (with or without other antihyperglycemic agents) at the time of conversion. In addition, patients must have had ≥ 1 HbA 1c reading within 3 months of the dose conversion and a follow-up HbA1c within 6 months after the dose conversion. To assess the primary objective of glycemic control that resulted from the liraglutide dose reduction, mean change of HbA1c at time of dose conversion was compared with mean HbA 1c 6 months postconversion. To assess savings, cost information was obtained from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Drug Price Database and monthly and annual costs of liraglutide 6 mg/mL injection 2-count pen pack were compared with that of the 3-count pen pack. A chart review of patients’ electronic health records assessed secondary outcomes. The VA Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) was used to collect patient data.